‘Komet’: Kochi Metro- Chance for world class rapid rail stations

-


Prime minister Manmohan Singh laid the foundation stone for the Kochi Metro rail project (aptly abbreviated as ‘KOMET’) a few days back. 

Dr. Singh said the Central support for the 25-km Kochi project, estimated at Rs. 5,180 crore, would be around Rs. 1,000 crore. Kochi would be the eighth city in India to have a Metro network.


As an architect, I am more interested in the built spaces for the project than its ubiquitous political controversies. Here is a chance for Kochi to build world class rapid rail stations, as is the case with many recent metros of similar class and scale.
"RAPID RAIL STATIONS ARE PUBLIC SPACES. FUNCTION, UTILITY AND SAFETY SHOULD TAKE A FRONT SEAT WHILE TAKING DESIGN DECISIONS"

 I have been fortunate to be a part of the team [Mott MacDonald  and Mackellar Architecture (U.K)] who designed the much famed underground stations of Delhi Metro including Connaught Place, New Delhi, Old Delhi, Central Secrateriat, Patel Chowk etc. and to further explore the design considerations for Rapid Rail stations as part of my Masters’ Thesis from IIT Roorkee. Since the building typology is a bit unfamiliar to many, I thought to share a few experiences of mine. (Believe me, I cannot do justice with a post since this is as complex a topic for even a Post Graduate thesis. See! J )



Rapid rail stations are public spaces. Function, utility and safety should take a front seat while taking design decisions.

To the layman a public transportation system is to a large extent an invisible skeleton of the city and metropolitan region, the comprehension of that structure generates an awareness and appreciation of the city itself, and an appreciation of travel through it.

Because of the wide divergence in age and character of existing rapid transit stations, it is obviously impossible to set a standard that all must follow. There must be deviations in order to achieve compatibility with existing transit structures and equipment. Individual transit properties are governed by their own authorizing statutes and regulations. Also considered should be the local context and the psychology of the users.

The general considerations should be;

1) Establish the system’s image through simple, logical and strong designs.
2) Provide movement patterns and directions for patrons that are easy to understand.
3) Meet safety and functional requirements without compromise.
4) Accommodate maintenance and replacement issues.
5) Provide facilities that are accessible to persons with disabilities.
6) Be cost-effective.
7) Provide public spaces that maintain or enhance the quality of nearby neighbourhoods.









I have tried to explain a few basic concepts through my incomprehensible sketches and representative images.

A lot of effort and money goes behind our public buildings like a Metro Station. It will be a pity, if it gets poorly planned and designed. Moreover, the construction quality itself leaves a lot to be desired. Hope that DMRC (and Sreedharan) comes up with a commendable job..!

Comments

  1. UnknownSeptember 18, 2012 at 11:35 AM

    Very impressive post Binu.

    Although have heard a lot about our Delhi metro never had a chance to visit there.Shall sometime soon :))

    A simple note:
    In spite investing ample of money ,time technology etc ; these public areas are always been seen ignored or NOT WELL MAINTAINED .May be Privatizing it will make a huge difference in our country :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Binu BalakrishnanSeptember 18, 2012 at 11:49 PM

    Thanks.! (would ve great if i could get your name also.)

    You have a point! Delhi metro in fact, changed this perception completely. By control measures (and partly by design), you cannot find any 'paan' stains (common for a public building of the area) inside the metro. Hope this can be replicated.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Make Sure it's Your Train

-
Image
Accept it. Student architects are always confused about choosing the right career path. It gets all the more complicated with myriad options (and specializations) available today. Though the scene has changed a lot, I think the speech by Charles Correa more than a decade ago ( Convocation Address at the School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, 1996 ) still is very relevant. I want to share his thoughts as a continuation of my post  'architecture as a profession' . His observations are sharp, as usual, and I am sure that any architect at any stage of his career will get useful (if not motivating) insights from the speech. Extracts from his talk are given below.     “How much we grow depends on the issues we have the good fortune to address. This brings to mind a story told to me by Arvind Talati, a young Indian architect who followed Doshi at Corbusier's office in Paris. After working for two years or so, when Talati decided to return to lndi
Read the complete post »

Revisiting Le Corbusier’s MOA building

-
Image
World has just celebrated 125 th birthday of one of the most influential architect of the 20 th century, Le Corbusier. This reminded me of my visit to the much famous Millowner's Association Building in Ahmedabad a few years back. There are few cities in the world that can claim more than three buildings by Le  Corbusier, and Ahmedabad is one of them(after Paris, Chandigarh and La Chaux-de-Fonds), with the Museum, the Millowners Association Building, and the Sarabhai and Shodhan houses to its credit. Such major commissions, all initiated during Le Corbusier’s first visit to the city, attest to Ahmedabad’s intellectual climate and economic prosperity unrivalled in India for a city of its size. A comparative visual study by Peter Serenyi, comparing the Hall of Public Audiences, Red Fort and the Assembly building, Chandigarh hinting on the inspirations of the architect for his public buildings. Since its founding by Sultan Ahmed, Shah of Gujrat in 1411 AD, A
Read the complete post »

Architects and sketching

-
Image
Architects are associated with sketching long before the profession has evolved. One automatically expects an architect to sketch and explain his point. Architectural career choices are still majorly influenced by the candidate’s proficiency in sketching . Is the skill heavily overrated? Or does it deserve the hype? The problem starts when one confuses sketching with ‘art’. Definitely, creativity (and thus similar tastes) has its own part in shaping an architect’s career. But what one forgets in the debate is the potential of a ‘ skill’ as basic as sketching which can help the professional in a long way throughout his career. It is a skill which can be learnt and mastered. A very powerful ‘tool’ - sometimes the most powerful - which if used with care, can simplify many a process. It’s also a skill which is very enjoyable. "STRIPPING INFORMATION INTO THE VERY BASICS HAS HUGE ADVANTAGES."
Read the complete post »