Are you replaceable

-

   as an architect?

   as an employee?

   as an artist?

   as an employer?

   as a manager?

   as a mother?

   as a husband?

If so, most likely you will get replaced in near future (maybe except for the personal relationships.!!). And you have no right to complain!


For a client an architect may not only be the designer; but also a mentor, friend, technical and financial adviser, negotiator, innovator, artist and also one who care to share the journey. Her role becomes irreplaceable once client find real value other than the mundane details. Though design quality is still the single most differentiator, it is unfortunate that more often, client may not be equipped to fairly judge the quality of design alone.

 "A PHILOSOPHY OF 'CAVEAT EMPTOR' HAS NEVER BEEN MORE INEPT" 

At the end of the day, there will sure be part of work which can be easily replaced. Key is to do this part well and focus more on the other. The terrible mistake is to ignore the other part (often the hardest) and keep oneself busy on the routine job until time runs out. Also a philosophy of 'caveat emptor' has never been more inept. There is no point in mulling over the amateur taking up your job.

In India, younger generations are still being taught and prepared to work well in factories or furnish service as told. There will always be a replacement for such a worker; most of the time a cheaper and better replacement. Especially when the world is Friedmanly flat, every such job could eagerly been looked upon by somebody from the other part of the planet, if not from your next block. Its time to change the academic structure to reward innovations and real value additions, most importantly in the fields of design.


Just give a thought about the work you did today. Are you on something which cannot be replaced?

Comments

  1. UnknownAugust 2, 2013 at 10:36 AM

    I feel everybody can be replaced in proffessional realm.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Binu BalakrishnanAugust 3, 2013 at 8:39 AM

    Rashmi, you are right. Companies try to standardize the work flow(even in design field) so that they can also train somebody else to do the job. Thanks for the response

    The post is an antithesis to the typical 'nobody is indispensable' HR argument applied to design field. It is not aimed to save jobs, but to take it to another level which makes you difficult to get replaced. After all, you still remember the caring doctor, inspiring teacher, selfless friend and know that they were above their roles and were kind of irreplaceable in their capacity.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Make Sure it's Your Train

-
Image
Accept it. Student architects are always confused about choosing the right career path. It gets all the more complicated with myriad options (and specializations) available today. Though the scene has changed a lot, I think the speech by Charles Correa more than a decade ago ( Convocation Address at the School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, 1996 ) still is very relevant. I want to share his thoughts as a continuation of my post  'architecture as a profession' . His observations are sharp, as usual, and I am sure that any architect at any stage of his career will get useful (if not motivating) insights from the speech. Extracts from his talk are given below.     “How much we grow depends on the issues we have the good fortune to address. This brings to mind a story told to me by Arvind Talati, a young Indian architect who followed Doshi at Corbusier's office in Paris. After working for two years or so, when Talati decided to return to lndi
Read the complete post »

Revisiting Le Corbusier’s MOA building

-
Image
World has just celebrated 125 th birthday of one of the most influential architect of the 20 th century, Le Corbusier. This reminded me of my visit to the much famous Millowner's Association Building in Ahmedabad a few years back. There are few cities in the world that can claim more than three buildings by Le  Corbusier, and Ahmedabad is one of them(after Paris, Chandigarh and La Chaux-de-Fonds), with the Museum, the Millowners Association Building, and the Sarabhai and Shodhan houses to its credit. Such major commissions, all initiated during Le Corbusier’s first visit to the city, attest to Ahmedabad’s intellectual climate and economic prosperity unrivalled in India for a city of its size. A comparative visual study by Peter Serenyi, comparing the Hall of Public Audiences, Red Fort and the Assembly building, Chandigarh hinting on the inspirations of the architect for his public buildings. Since its founding by Sultan Ahmed, Shah of Gujrat in 1411 AD, A
Read the complete post »

Architects and sketching

-
Image
Architects are associated with sketching long before the profession has evolved. One automatically expects an architect to sketch and explain his point. Architectural career choices are still majorly influenced by the candidate’s proficiency in sketching . Is the skill heavily overrated? Or does it deserve the hype? The problem starts when one confuses sketching with ‘art’. Definitely, creativity (and thus similar tastes) has its own part in shaping an architect’s career. But what one forgets in the debate is the potential of a ‘ skill’ as basic as sketching which can help the professional in a long way throughout his career. It is a skill which can be learnt and mastered. A very powerful ‘tool’ - sometimes the most powerful - which if used with care, can simplify many a process. It’s also a skill which is very enjoyable. "STRIPPING INFORMATION INTO THE VERY BASICS HAS HUGE ADVANTAGES."
Read the complete post »